A contribution from David Wilcox for discussion with Hub advisory group, Our Way Ahead and Connecting Londoners. January 2018
The diagram builds on proposals in the documents Extending the Hub and a Community of Practice for networking London civil society. It is based on the one-year Networked City exploration by Connecting Londoners and Our Way Ahead. It is deliberately ‘big picture’ and will need to be reduced, focussed, and staged depending in commitment and resources.
In summary: what’s needed is a community of people keen to learn how to build networks bottom-up and bottom-across in local communities and pan-London, together with support, service providers, and advisers. Activities would include meet-ups, an online platform, and on-the-ground activities to map and build networks.
These activities would complement and extend the work of the charitable company, the Hub for London, where networks and networking are to be one of three core functions - but where there will only be one member of staff specifically working on that. The aim is to help put into practice the recommendations of consultant Steve Wyler’s report which said:
The Hub “should act as a convenor and enabler, rather than direct deliverer, in effect delivering change through networks and platforms, rather than through traditional organisational and membership delivery methods”. This note is about how to help develop those networks, and join them up in platforms.
Activities
Meetups might be informal get-togethers, workshops, Living Lab games and simulations, and Zoom online events. The online collaboration platform will be a blog that feeds topics into an online forum, together with social media and a wiki. The forum will be home for a Community of Practice. Mapping and network building will be piloted with existing networks, and with people who wish to develop local or pan-London networks.
The model, brand and narrative
The model is one of a learning network and community. The approach, brand and narrative will depend on how closely it is associated with the Hub or other groups … and how far the focus is on individuals and groups or infrastructure. For example:
The Community of Practice and its content
In practice we are likely to support activity at a number of different levels, as discussed in the paper on a CoP. At one level there may be a small group of people who have developed mutual trust to work together on ideas and projects. At another level there may be a wider informal network sharing content as and when.
We would aim to recruit individuals and social enterprises who offer services and who are also prepared to share some of the their expertise, as well as people prepared to offer some pro bono support. it will take time to develop a model, communities and networks that offer appropriate benefits to the different interests and stakeholders. While we will aim for startup funding, sustainability will depend on a mix of mutual cooperation and sale of services. We will explore whether the core group wish to incorporate as a coop.
The content will depend on which narrative and brand to adopt, and on the interests of those who join the community.
Outputs from the community and network
The level of outputs will depend on how well resourced are the community and network. If we are well resourced they might include, for example:
If the community and network has limited resources, outputs will depend on sharing by service and support providers and the voluntary commitment of members.
Next steps
I’m offering these ideas to the advisory group for the Hub, and for subsequent discussion with Connecting Londoners and Our Way Ahead. On the other hand, the advisory group may decide that the model and these opportunities are a matter for the trustees and staff of the new company. In that case Connecting Londoners, perhaps with Our Way Ahead, may proceed with some initial demonstration of what’s possible, and an interim funding bid. In those circumstances we can proceed by publishing the proposals and: